Diaspore

How it was tested

The method, what each result is compared with, and the known limits.

The method

Known limits

Not on the Results page

9 of 16 registered tests are not shown as results, because they did not pass, were too small to judge, or are not finished:

The detail

The model and its tests

Every past test with its numbers, the dated receipts, and what failed.

Sources and gaps

Where every number comes from, the date range of each source, and what is missing.

Who graded what

What was scored by code, by an AI, or by a person.

How the search works, and what it cannot do

The same index as the command line

297,038 papers are searchable: every paper in the index. 202,638 of them (68%) have extracted claims; the rest had no abstract to read and match on their title only. Papers run from 2010-01-01 to 2025-12-31.

The index is 22,987 static files, 229 MB. Your browser fetches only the files for your words: about 2.9 MB for a first search and 144 KB for each later one (largest measured: 3.6 MB and 868 KB).

The same ranking, checked by code

The browser returned the same ten labs in the same order as the command-line search in 360 of 360 cases (30 queries, 6 dates, filter on and off). Its word stemmer matched the index on 329,906 words with 0 mismatches. Checked 2026-11-10. code-checked

Because the ranking is the same, its measured quality applies: with the product filter on, 0.86 of the top ten labs were relevant, against 0.58 for plain keyword search on the same abstracts (difference +0.28, 95% interval +0.19 to +0.36; 20 queries; better on 15, tied on 4, worse on 0). AI-judged Method.

Your date is applied in your browser

The files hold the whole corpus, with each paper's date. A static file cannot know your date, so the page drops every paper and company link dated after it before ranking. A date before the first paper returns nothing. The date rule is one function, tested against the project's own.

A lab with no last-author paper for 24 months before your date is marked possibly inactive. It may have moved, changed direction or closed; the data cannot tell which.

What it cannot do

No synonyms: a topic phrased unusually finds nothing. Claims come from claude-haiku-5-5 reading one abstract each; 98% (95% interval 94% to 99%) of sampled claims were supported by their abstract, graded by AI readers, not by a person. A lab is three recent papers at each of 4 year-ends, so its key paper can be missing. A common word is cut off at its 20,000 best-matching papers, as on the command line.